|
![]() it is their right, it is their duty... |
|
PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™ : a singular solution to inflation, deflation, intrinsic manipulation of the value of money or property, and inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to a circulation. |
|
MEDIA AND REPUBLICAN PARTY CORRUPTION — THE 2007 CASE OF THE MISSING CANDIDATE AND PERPETUALLY DISAPPEARING POLLS...
JULY 7, 2007...????? The Republican Party has tried from the beginning to keep its star candidate even from participating in the candidate debates. Why? They are the party which originally proposed a central bank; so you tell me. The party has been taken over by raiders. You can take it back. They're trying to hide Ron Paul! But they can't succeed; they only piss us off all the further. If you ask anyone over 70 who Ron Paul is, they still don't know (unless they frequent the Internet). But if you frequent the Internet, you know he's the runaway favorite of everyone who seeks the least beyond the disinformation of the mainstream media. Polls for instance are constantly disappearing as soon as they show Ron Paul is the favorite. Here's a disappeared ABC poll for instance. Nobody else is even close:
ABC post Republican debate poll at August 6, 2007, 12:30 PM shows Ron Paul taking 68% of the Republican vote and 64% of the vote not only of Republican supporters, but those who indicate they intend to vote Democrat. PURPOSELY SKEWING PERCEPTIONS OF THE PROSPECTS OF THE ELECTION — THE 2007 CASE OF THE MISSING CANDIDATE
MSNBC Poll recorded December 10, 2007 purposely excludes Ron Paul from results. The mainstream media is already throwing the election. Even with Ron Paul excluded without explanation, 25 percent of the disposition is unaccounted for! Where did it go, MSNBC? Examples of election corruption are prolific. At no time in our history possibly, do we have clearer, more incontrovertible evidence of a conspiracy to keep the Federal Reserve issue off the ballot. These efforts are obviously concerted; and these people are working diligently to obstruct your ascendancy! DECEMBER 10, 2007 — "THE ECONOMIST" EXCLUDES PAUL FROM POLL
December 10, 2007 screen shot of "The Economist" article citing poll. RealClearPolitics? Bah! CLICK HERE for an example of these distortions, attempting to eliminate Ron Paul from the landscape. In this particular disinformation, "The Economist" claims that Mike Huckabee has just passed Mitt Romney to take the lead of Republican frontrunners. Bah. Online polls show Paul has more support than all the other candidates combined. Write the editor at "The Economist" (letters[at]economist.com) and complain about this purposed disinformation. Here's my letter: Regarding your story, "Winter Surprise," I write to complain of its incredible falsification of purported polling data. If you were paying attention to actual polls, you would find them disappearing at an amazing rate. The real story is that these polls are disappearing — and that in every disappearing poll, Ron Paul is the runaway favorite. I have done a modest job of chronicling some of the disappearances. Here is a screen shot of an ABC Poll which vanished not long after it found that none of the other candidates could keep up with Ron Paul.
This is hardly the only instance. After site visitors wrote complaining of a poll excluding Ron Paul from a Republican campaign headquarters site, I wrote asking why Ron Paul was not even included in the poll. To my surprise, they replied, saying their software only handled 5 options, and that they did not think that Ron Paul had but the least following. I cited a number of online polls which on the contrary, show without exception that Ron Paul has an overwhelming lead OVER ALL THE OTHER CANDIDATES PUT TOGETHER. I also offered to fix their software. To my surprise, they wrote back a week later, saying they had just posted a fixed poll, and to please remember to vote. Because I was busy, I couldn't visit for an hour. When I did visit, Ron Paul already had 60 percent of the vote. An hour later he had 70 percent. An hour later he had 80 percent. A few days later the poll was permanently taken down. So there is a huge disparity between the truth and your purported article. I frankly assume you are guilty of attempting to preserve the so called Federal Reserve despite its consequences to us. "Economist" my ass. What else could explain such a lie? Sincerely, mike montagne If you would like to send the editor to this reference to their misdeeds, here is the link: http://www.perfecteconomy.com/pg-pfmpe-news-or-commentary.html#TheEconomist
BAY AREA REPUBLICAN CAMPAIGN OFFICE EXCLUDES RON PAUL FROM "POLL"; I can personally tell you that a Bay Area Republican campaign office had a poll up which didn't even list Ron Paul as a voting option. I wrote them of course, declaring it was obvious why they would exclude Dr. Paul. To my surprise, they wrote back saying it was a fault of their software — that it only provided five options. I'm a software engineer, so I wrote back offering to fix their software and asking why they picked *any* of the selected five above Dr. Paul, citing his predominant popularity on the Internet. A week later, they wrote, saying they had fixed their software, and to please remember to vote. I was busy, and couldn't visit the site for an hour. When I did, Ron Paul ALREADY HAD 60 PERCENT OF THE VOTE!!!!!!!!!! An hour later, he had 70 percent; and hour later, 80 percent; a few days later, the poll disappeared. How low can the Republican Party go? RELATED MATERIAL
"To find the players in all the corruption of the world, 'Follow the money.' To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way."
BACK TO INDEX |
Gross National Public Debt Clock "National debt," perhaps better said to be "federal debt," refers only to public debt accumulated by the federal government. National debt does not include the even greater sum of private debt, or further public debt accumulated by state and local governments. PER CAPITA, THE CURRENT FEDERAL PUBLIC DEBT COMES TO APPROXIMATELY THIRTY-THOUSAND DOLLARS. FIGURED AT THE ROUGH SCALE USED BELOW TO DETERMINE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PRIVATE DEBT, THE AVERAGE FEDERAL DEBT WOULD BE ROUGHLY $93,750 PER ELDER ADULT MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF FEDERAL DEBT. BUT LIKE PRIVATE DEBT, THE UNDUE BURDENS OF THIS SHARE WILL SIMPLY BE SADDLED UPON YOUNGER GENERATIONS. Javascript must be enabled for zfacts.com to display the clock's real time gross national public debt data. PER CAPITA U.S. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE DEBT Estimates of the sum of private and public U.S. debt together, accounting for potential Social Security and Medicare liabilities as of November, 2007, run as much as more than $96 trillion; or $320,000 per capita even for infants; OR AN AVERAGE OF ROUGHLY HALF A MILLION DOLLARS PER ADULT. THIS EQUATES TO ROUGHLY $1 MILLION PER ELDER ADULT, MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR ENGENDERING THIS DEBT. RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT, 2008 REGISTER TO VOTE
VOTING/REGISTRATION STRATEGY: IF RON PAUL DOES NOT RECEIVE THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION, I CONDEMN THAT PARTY TO THE DUST BIN. I REGISTERED REPUBLICAN (FORMERLY INDEPENDENT) SOLELY TO VOTE RON PAUL IN MY STATE PRIMARY. SHOULD RON PAUL BE DENIED THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION, I RECOMMEND A PROTEST VOTE — IN OTHER WORDS, VOTING FOR RON PAUL AS A WRITE-IN IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.
BROWSER INSTRUCTIONS TO ADD THIS PAGE TO YOUR BOOKMARKS OR FAVORITES...
BOOKMARKS > BOOKMARK THIS PAGE TO MAKE THIS PAGE YOUR BROWSER'S HOME PAGE... TOOLS > OPTIONS... SPREAD THE WORD! PEOPLE MAY NEVER COME HERE UNLESS YOU RECOMMEND THIS MATERIAL! TO SEND THIS PAGE AS A LINK OR PAGE... FILE > SEND... CLICK THE COPY-TO-CLIPBOARD TOOLS TO... COPY THE URL TO THIS PAGE: COPY THE HTML CODE FOR AN ANCHOR TO THIS PAGE: COPY THE HTML CODE FOR AN ANCHOR TO OUR HOME PAGE:
PLEASE SUPPORT PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™!
|
|
|