|
![]() it is their right, it is their duty... |
|
PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™ : the singular integral solution to 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to a circulation. |
|
'MPE™ 106' — 'MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR'
mike montagne
ANSWER TO 1996 MSNBC QUESTION (PUBLISHED BY MSNBC), "ARE POLITICAL REPORTERS POLITICALLY BIASED?" "Unless there is an editor or reporter with a perfectly neutral work-focus and style of presentation, then ALL reporters and editors are politically biased." "Bias however, is no sensitive issue where a mature audience is apt to detect bias and account for it. The damaging aspect of 'news' coverage is its non-focus on imperative issues and qualifiable solution; and that so many citizens of all countries of the world hold to so many irrelevant snippets as if they can be served by them." "For some 20 years for instance, the prospect of a 'balanced budget' occasionally draws some focus. But, in the news, and in politics, never have we seen an exhaustive proof of whether it is even mathematically possible to balance the budget under current and ever-worsening conditions. If however, world politics will ever see the solution of ever-mounting debt, and a solution of the ever greater costs of ever mounting debt, inevitably this will be through the eyes of a mathematic expression equivalent to conclusive, mathematic proof." "Do the people even want to see or hear this, or administer to issues in conclusive terms? Only their focus on such a scope will tell. But certainly no news-service offers the inevitable argument." "In any event, the impertinence of the audience befits the impertinence of submitted material. If they had no equally impertinent audience... all impertinent material, and all impertinent politicians, would be equally vanished." "Just something to consider, as we plunge ever deeper into insoluble debt." Saturday, April 5, 2008 'MPE™ 106' — 'MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR': IT IS NEITHER AN OFFENSE OR DISADVANTAGE THAT TOKENS OF WEALTH COST NOTHING It is not an offense that money costs nothing, for if a currency represents only the wealth and *whole lack* of injurious processes united in natural trade, then the *costlessness* of the non-injurious tokens of wealth only paves the way for a *costless* system. It is ignorant therefore to persist in shouting out against "creating money out of thin air," or furthermore to simply presume that doing so is "inflationary," for by definition and effect both, inflation of the sum of circulation can only occur if the circulation is increased moreso than the value of whatever assets for which the money is loaned into circulation. We have already observed however that this cannot occur, because we can borrow no more than the nominal value of the specific asset. If an injury is inflicted then by some related process, we must identify that explicit related process, if we are to solve or eradicate it. THE CRIME OF FEDERAL OVER-SPENDING The offense to which the present shouting against federal over-spending wishes to speak is the crime against our progeny and the very chance they can survive as such a nation. This is not only an ominous crime, but even a terminal crime against them, because in extending *our* falsified prosperity under present magnitudes of debt which for our own iniquities we ourselves have made ourselves capable of servicing, we heap yet the multiplying costs of the false preservation of our own hides upon later generations, who will be asked to pay those debts from even far more disadvantaged positions. Even so, we are not even suffering presently (or even into the distant forseeable future) for this potentially great injustice, because we are not paying down (and *only* ever moreso *cannot* afford to pay down) that sum of debt. What then is the real force, presently driving the cost of sustaining ourselves ever moreso beyond our means? It's the interest. It's the interest. It's the interest. It is the inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt by interest which, in rendering us incapable of maintaining a vital circulation by further private borrowing, forces usurers to extend their graft by unpaid borrowing against federal over-spending. What would happen if we terminated this federal over-spending without first perfecting the economy? We would immediately suffer mass systemic deflation, because as we pay against private and public debt and cannot afford otherwise to re-borrow as necessary to replenish the circulation, it is thus this federal overspending which has necessarily become a vital temporary cog of the stratagem: Unless we first perfect the economy by eradicating interest, we have no other way of maintaining a vital circulation any longer, because we have let the system degenerate us to this very state (and continue to let it destroy us further). While that undue spending really only moves multiplication of private debt to the federal side of the ledger (where we simply ignore its vast multiplication for the while), the unpayable accumulation of this debt too will ultimately fail to sustain the system, because ultimately the interest even only on federal debt will crush us. It is not that "the money" "is created out of thin air," or that the gold standard can possibly be implemented *or* save us from further multiplication of debt the gold standard has no power to avert. It's the interest. It's the interest. It's the interest. In fact the imposed "monetary" system even has no power whatever to inflict the objected injuries but *by interest*.
"To find the players in all the corruption of the world, 'Follow the money.' To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way." |
pfmpe[ at ]perfecteconomy[ dot ]com Gross National Public Debt Clock "National debt," perhaps better said to be "federal debt," refers only to public debt accumulated by the federal government. National debt does not include the even greater sum of private debt, or further public debt accumulated by state and local governments. PER CAPITA, THE CURRENT FEDERAL PUBLIC DEBT COMES TO APPROXIMATELY THIRTY-THOUSAND DOLLARS. FIGURED AT THE ROUGH SCALE USED BELOW TO DETERMINE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PRIVATE DEBT, THE AVERAGE FEDERAL DEBT WOULD BE ROUGHLY $93,750 PER ELDER ADULT MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF FEDERAL DEBT. BUT LIKE PRIVATE DEBT, THE UNDUE BURDENS OF THIS SHARE WILL SIMPLY BE SADDLED UPON YOUNGER GENERATIONS. Javascript must be enabled for zfacts.com to display the clock's real time gross national public debt data. PER CAPITA U.S. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE DEBT Estimates of the sum of private and public U.S. debt together, accounting for potential Social Security and Medicare liabilities as of November, 2007, run as much as more than $96 trillion; or $320,000 per capita even for infants; OR AN AVERAGE OF ROUGHLY HALF A MILLION DOLLARS PER ADULT. THIS EQUATES TO ROUGHLY $1 MILLION PER ELDER ADULT, MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR ENGENDERING THIS DEBT.
BROWSER INSTRUCTIONS TO ADD THIS PAGE TO YOUR BOOKMARKS OR FAVORITES...
BOOKMARKS > BOOKMARK THIS PAGE TO MAKE THIS PAGE YOUR BROWSER'S HOME PAGE... TOOLS > OPTIONS... SPREAD THE WORD! PEOPLE MAY NEVER COME HERE UNLESS YOU RECOMMEND THIS MATERIAL! TO SEND THIS PAGE AS A LINK OR PAGE... FILE > SEND... CLICK THE COPY-TO-CLIPBOARD TOOLS TO... COPY THE URL TO THIS PAGE: COPY THE HTML CODE FOR AN ANCHOR TO THIS PAGE: COPY THE HTML CODE FOR AN ANCHOR TO OUR HOME PAGE:
PLEASE SUPPORT PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™!
DONATIONS FROM JANUARY 1979 TO APRIL 2008, $0.00!!! My great appreciation to Max Demarzi, who donated $100 on May 11, 2008. |
|
|