|
![]() it is their right, it is their duty... |
|
PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™ : the singular integral solution to 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to a circulation. |
|
THE PURPORTED QUESTION OF WHO SHOULD ISSUE THE CURRENCY
Benjamin Franklin
FRANKLIN DISCLOSES THAT THE REAL REASON THE COLONISTS EFFORTS ERUPTED IN THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION WAS USURPATION OF A CURRENCY THE PEOPLE CREATED We would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters, had it not been that they took from us our money, which created great unemployment and dissatisfaction. Within a year, the poor houses were filled. The hungry and homeless walked the streets everywhere. Wednesday, April 16, 2008 THE PURPORTED QUESTION OF WHO SHOULD ISSUE THE CURRENCY In order to represent the related obligation, currency comes into circulation as a debt. In order to duly represent the wealth, its trade, and its consumption, in mathematically perfected economy™ the debt is not subject to interest, the related obligation is not multiplied by unearned taking, and the unmultiplied obligation is paid at the rate of consumption of the related asset. Regardless of whoever issues the currency, the real debt is to the producer of the wealth, who accepts the currency as a token of the resultant obligation. Ordinarily then, as our Parable of Perfect Economy tells of the American Colonial system, a debtor would issue a note (promise to pay) to the possessor/producer of wealth, who is the real creditor. The natural creditor is not loaning the debtor money, for none exists for the transaction or the debtor would not have to issue a note. Under these natural conditions then, the debtor is the natural issuer of money. Not only are the people the natural issuers of money then; it is necessary to issue just this money at this juncture of the distribution of new production, or we suffer deficient circulation to sustain commerce (deflation). Moreover then, without a further devised monetary system, no one even could reasonably issue promises to pay (money), but debtors. WHY ACCEPT THE DEBT WITHOUT INTEREST? So if *we* took these debts with interest, then should we need alike to issue or accept credit, our taking and paying would cancel each other's, and there wouldn't even be any ultimate point of this. Furthermore, especially if different rates of interest might be presumed, we would involve ourselves in much effort and even strife, determining a just rate of interest which still would inevitably cancel in the paying and taking of just interest. But any preoccupation with interest would absolutely be for nought if we could eliminate potential loss to every creditor, that we cannot even say risk exists, ostensibly to justify interest. How would we do that? Even presently in fact, government already attempts to ensure that creditors are delivered on debts, even as the very interest of the imposed monetary system introduces an entirely artificial risk, and multiplies that artificial risk until fulfillment of the perpetually multiplying obligations is inevitably impossible. So the structure and even the intent already exist, except that the interest of the purported monetary system ultimately makes the success of the system impossible. But in mathematically perfected economy™ (alone), the remaining value of the related property *always* makes it possible to recoup the remainder of the entire remaining obligation in the form of the very property itself. So mathematically perfected economy™ imposes no risk or stress on the present infrastructures, which can be extended little to represent their further interest of eradicating the consequences of usury. WHO WOULD LOAN MONEY IF IT WERE NOT SUBJECT TO INTEREST? No one needs to loan money at interest under mathematically perfected economy™ then, because all necessary supplies of it can be jointly issued and even certified by the natural issuers of the currency — the very people.
"To find the players in all the corruption of the world, 'Follow the money.' To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way." |
pfmpe[ at ]perfecteconomy[ dot ]com Gross National Public Debt Clock "National debt," perhaps better said to be "federal debt," refers only to public debt accumulated by the federal government. National debt does not include the even greater sum of private debt, or further public debt accumulated by state and local governments. PER CAPITA, THE CURRENT FEDERAL PUBLIC DEBT COMES TO APPROXIMATELY THIRTY-THOUSAND DOLLARS. FIGURED AT THE ROUGH SCALE USED BELOW TO DETERMINE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PRIVATE DEBT, THE AVERAGE FEDERAL DEBT WOULD BE ROUGHLY $93,750 PER ELDER ADULT MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF FEDERAL DEBT. BUT LIKE PRIVATE DEBT, THE UNDUE BURDENS OF THIS SHARE WILL SIMPLY BE SADDLED UPON YOUNGER GENERATIONS. Javascript must be enabled for zfacts.com to display the clock's real time gross national public debt data. PER CAPITA U.S. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE DEBT Estimates of the sum of private and public U.S. debt together, accounting for potential Social Security and Medicare liabilities as of November, 2007, run as much as more than $96 trillion; or $320,000 per capita even for infants; OR AN AVERAGE OF ROUGHLY HALF A MILLION DOLLARS PER ADULT. THIS EQUATES TO ROUGHLY $1 MILLION PER ELDER ADULT, MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR ENGENDERING THIS DEBT.
BROWSER INSTRUCTIONS TO ADD THIS PAGE TO YOUR BOOKMARKS OR FAVORITES...
BOOKMARKS > BOOKMARK THIS PAGE TO MAKE THIS PAGE YOUR BROWSER'S HOME PAGE... TOOLS > OPTIONS... SPREAD THE WORD! PEOPLE MAY NEVER COME HERE UNLESS YOU RECOMMEND THIS MATERIAL! TO SEND THIS PAGE AS A LINK OR PAGE... FILE > SEND... CLICK THE COPY-TO-CLIPBOARD TOOLS TO... COPY THE URL TO THIS PAGE: COPY THE HTML CODE FOR AN ANCHOR TO THIS PAGE: COPY THE HTML CODE FOR AN ANCHOR TO OUR HOME PAGE:
PLEASE SUPPORT PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™!
DONATIONS FROM JANUARY 1979 TO APRIL 2008, $0.00!!! My great appreciation to Max Demarzi, who donated $100 on May 11, 2008. |
|
|